Legal Opinion

Stilphen v. Elliott

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1918No. 3208PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the District Court of Salt Lake County, Third District; Hon. Wm. H. Bramel, Judge. Action by C. A. Stilphen against William R. Elliott and another, as copartners, doing business as the Utah Engineering & Machinery Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGideon, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $445 alleged to be due for two diamond rings sold defendants on or about the 1st day of November, 1913. Defendants answered admitting the purchase of the diamond rings, but alleged in a counterclaim that the plaintiff was indebted to defendants for moneys advanced to plaintiff while in the employ of defendants.

It appears that defendants (a partnership) are an engineering concern conducting a business in Salt Lake City; that about January 23, 1911, plaintiff was employed by the defendants to assist in handling defendants’ business. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Daintrey v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Angerman Co., Inc. v. Edgemon Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API