Legal Opinion

Demchick v. 90 East End Avenue Condominium

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J.), entered January 9, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on their first cause of action and denied defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing that cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, plaintiffs’ motion denied and defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment granted. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Defendant 90 East End Avenue Condominium is a luxury condominium building containing 43 residential units, 38 of which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Bruken Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Franklin v. SpadaforaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Anderson v. 50 East 72nd Street CondominiumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Four Bros. Homes at Heartland Condominium II v. GerbinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strathmore Ridge Homeowners Ass'n v. MendicinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Board of Mgrs. of the 28 Cliff St. Condominium v. MaguireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Board of Mgrs. of the 28 Cliff St. Condominium v. MaguireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  4. Lisenenkov v. KaszirerNew York Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Borress & Borress LLC v. CSJ LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API