Legal Opinion

Russell v. Russell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1993No. D-3135PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HIGHTOWER, Justice.

In these consolidated eases, we consider the effect of a 1989 amendment to section 1.91 of the Texas Family Code, entitled “Proof of Certain Informal Marriages,” concerning evidence of an agreement to be “informally” married. In each case, the trial court found that an informal marriage existed. The courts of appeal, however, reached conflicting results. In Russell v. Russell, the Ninth Court of Appeals affirmed the existence of an informal marriage although it reversed and remanded the case to the trial court to determine when the informal marriage began. 838 S.W.2d…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Farley v. MM Cattle CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. $11,014.00Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Tompkins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ElderTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. Colburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Shepherd v. LedfordTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Blount v. Bordens, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Escalante v. LidgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API