Legal Opinion

City of Minneapolis v. Norman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 6, 1953No. 36,033PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dell, Justice.

This comes before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal on two grounds — (1) that the notice of appeal was not served upon the *498Prudential Insurance Company of America who respondent claims is an adverse party upon whom service was required for an effective appeal, and (2) that the appellant, Andrus Norman, is not a party having the right to appeal since, as respondent claims, appellant has no special interest in the real estate involved here that is not common to all residents of Minneapolis.

Since appellant claims that there is insufficient information before us in order to pass…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Kells v. Nelson-Tenney Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  3. Rendahl v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Thwing v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Weiland v. Northwestern Distilleries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Joint Independent Consolidated School District No. 116Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. In Re Order of Superintendent of Schools, Nobles CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  3. Hayes v. City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Thayer v. DuffySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  5. Thayer v. DuffySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API