Legal Opinion
Corpac v. Rubin & Rothman, LLC
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 28, 2013No. CV 10-4165 (ADS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
As stated by the Court in a prior Order, this case involves allegations by John T. Corpac, on behalf of himself and a putative class (the “class” or “the plaintiffs”), that Rubin & Rothman, LLC (“the defendant”) sent written collection communications that falsely represented or implied that an attorney had meaningfully reviewed the *347plaintiffs account and was meaningfully involved with the decision to send the communication, in violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seq.
This law suit was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Visa U.S.A. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,745 Dean Woods, and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Covington County Bank, Edward Hoglund v. Covington County BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Corpac v. Rubin & Rothman, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Felix v. Northstar Location Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2013