Legal Opinion
City of Peekskill v. Continental Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 9, 1998No. 97 Civ. 4116(BDP)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
PARKER, District Judge.
Plaintiff City of Peekskill (“the City”) filed this action against defendant Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) to collect the proceeds of a public improvement bond (“the Bond”) issued by Continental in the amount of $1,121,000 in May 1989. The Bond was issued to secure the obligation of the Mount Florence Group (“Mount Florence”), as developer, to construct public improvements in connection with a residential development known as Townhouse II, which was part of the Chapel Hill Estates project in Peekskill, New York. In…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Town of Shawangunk v. Goldwil Properties Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Mount Florence Group v. City of PeekskillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Varlotta Construction Corp. v. Sette-Juliano Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Town of New Windsor v. Inbro Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. City of BrooksvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2010