Legal Opinion
Namisnak v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 26, 2021No. 3:17-cv-06124Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SCOTT CRAWFORD, 10 Case No. 17-cv-02664-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 12 DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING 13 MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTION Defendants. TO STRIKE 14 15 STEPHAN NAMISNAK, et al., Case No. 17-cv-06124-RS 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR 18 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND MOTION 19 Defendants. TO STRIKE 20 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.