Princess Manufacturing Company v. Jarrell

VANCE, Commissioner.

The appellee, Lou Ethel Jarrell (hereinafter referred to as the employee) developed a breaking-out or rash, referred to in the medical testimony as urticarial hives, as a result of an allergic reaction to certain fabrics used in the manufacture of garments by Princess Manufacturing Company (hereinafter referred to as employer).

The employee was found by the board to be totally disabled. Although disability was not considered permanent, the board found no evidence of complete recovery nor evidence that other work opportunity was available to the employee and entered an…