Legal Opinion

Crocker v. Manhattan Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtLawbence, J.

After examining the testimony given by the different surveyors and the surveys put in evidence in this case, I am of the opinion that it has been proven that the southerly wall of the defendant’s building overhangs the point on Broadway which is distant 204 feet and inches southerly from the southeasterly comer of Broadway and Wall street, at the roof of No. 70 Broad*688way, about two and five-eighths inches. This would not bring the line of the defendant’s northerly wall over the plaintiff’s true southern boundary line, because the deed of the plaintiff makes the commencement point in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Amerman v. . DeaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. McSorley v. GomprechtThe Superior Court of New York City · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Owenson v. BradLeyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Alaska Juneau Gold Mining Co. v. Northern Lumber MillsDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API