Legal Opinion

Spolar v. Datsopoulos

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2003No. 02-197PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Eugene Spolar appeals from the judgment of the Second Judicial District Court, dismissing his legal malpractice claim as barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm.

¶2 The following issue is raised on appeal:

¶3 Whether the District Court erred in ruling that Spolar’s legal malpractice claim was barred by the statute of limitations, § 27-2-206, MCA.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶4 Spolar brought a legal malpractice action against the Defendants and Respondents, Milton Datsopoulos and Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind, P.C., alleging that Datsopoulos was professionally negligent and had breached an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BarrettMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Peschel v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Schneider v. LeaphartMontana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Uhler v. DoakMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stockman Bank of Montana v. PottsMontana Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ereth v. Cascade CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Ehrman v. Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, PCMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Passmore v. WatsonMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Ehrman v. Kaufman, Vidal, Hileman & Ramlow, PCMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Ereth v. Cascade CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API