Legal Opinion
Soto v. Knight Transporation CA4/2
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 18, 2014No. E056536Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 9/18/14 Soto v. Knight Transporation CA4/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO CONRADO SOTO, Plaintiff and Appellant, E056536 v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC530528) KNIGHT TRANSPORTATION et al., OPINION…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- James R. O'COnner v. Commonwealth Edison Company and London Nuclear Services, Inc., and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Davoll v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.