Legal Opinion

Toney v. Briley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 15, 2004No. 3-03-0159PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOLDRIDGE

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiff, Department of Corrections (DOC) inmate Alvin E Toney, brought a federal civil rights action (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2000)) against numerous named DOC employees. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss, predicated upon section 2 — 615 of the Code of Civil Procedure. 735 ILCS 5/2 — 615 (West 2002). The defendants contended that Toney’s action failed to state a cause of action due to his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Eduardo M. Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Michael J. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
  3. Beahringer v. PageIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Randall v. LemkeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baker v. RolnickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Bloom v. MuckenthalerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  3. Smith v. HobartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021
  4. BERRY VS. FEILNevada Supreme Court · 2015
  5. BERRY VS. FEILNevada Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API