Hutchinson v. Renner
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFunk, J.
The parties are in the same relation as they were below and will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants.
Plaintiff, G-eorge Hutchinson, sued defendants to recover the balance., due on a promissory note given for several cows defendants purchased from plaintiff. The petition was in the usual short form.
The answer for the first defense admitted the execution and delivery of the note and the partial payments thereon, as alleged in the petition, and denied all other allegations in the petition. The second defense, after adopting the allegations of the first defense, reads as follows:
“…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marmet Coal Co. v. People's Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Bloch v. Eastern Mach. Screw Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Herbrand Co. v. Lackawanna Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Regina Co. v. Gately Furniture Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- Canada Maple Exchange, Ltd. v. Scudder Syrup Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- W. S. Maxwell Co. v. Southern Oregon Gas Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Wilkes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Soya Processing Co. v. SirotaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Ex Parte Ray Louis Johnson, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2015