Legal Opinion

Miller Brewing Co. v. Capitol Distributing Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1937No. 5752PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLFE, Justice.

The plaintiff and defendant companies are, respectively, Wisconsin and Utah corporations. The plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Capital Distributing Company whereby the former agreed to ship beer to the latter for sale by the latter in Utah. Later, an instrument was signed by defendants W. R. Hess, Fred Lundberg, and I. Eisner, all officers of the Capitol Distributing Company, guaranteeing payment within “30 days from date of each such sale of the price of all such goods now or hereafter to be sold and/or delivered to the said Capitol Distributing Company by the said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Citizens Nat. Bank v. BuckheitAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co., Inc. v. StohlUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Rose City Bottling Works v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
  4. Sunny South Lumber Co. v. Neimeyer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  5. Charter Oak Life Insurance v. SawyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kansas City Wholesale Grocery Co. v. Weber Packing Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Miller Brewing Co. v. Capitol Distributing Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. William C. Moore & Co. v. SanchezUtah Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Garner v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API