Legal Opinion
Gagossian v. Arakelian
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1908No. Civ. No. 538PublishedCited by 3 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
A demurrer to the complaint was overruled. The case was dismissed as to all the defendants except Harry Arakelian. After trial the judgment went against him in favor of the plaintiff. This appeal is from the judgment on the judgment-roll.
Plaintiff alleges, and the court found, that on June 26, 1905, S. A. Gagossian was the owner of a certificate of membership No. 67 issued by the Grocers’ Winery and Distillery Association of Parlier, a corporation organized under the co-operative incorporation laws of California; that on said day he sold, assigned and conveyed all his right, title and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Freitas v. FreitasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Lamus v. EngwichtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919