Legal Opinion

George Martin Bradley, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1965No. 17965_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

George Martin Bradley, Jr. appeals pro se from an order of Judge Stephenson denying him relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 without a hearing. He contends that he was deprived of due process of law in that (a) he was not competent to stand trial; (b) he was not given a proper hearing to determine his competency to stand trial; (c) the government failed to sustain its burden of proving that he was sane at the time of the alleged offense; (d) he was not competent at the time of sentencing; and (e) his court-appointed counsel negligently and incompetently represented him.

An examination of the district…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Solesbee v. BalkcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. James P. Taylor v. United States of America, James Peter Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
  3. Nobles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  5. D. A. Simmons, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Houser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. George M. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  3. James Lowell Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  4. Wilfred Frank Peoples v. United States of America, Warden J. J. Norton and John O. Garaas, United States AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  5. Stewart v. StephensDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API