George Martin Bradley, Jr. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
George Martin Bradley, Jr. appeals pro se from an order of Judge Stephenson denying him relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 without a hearing. He contends that he was deprived of due process of law in that (a) he was not competent to stand trial; (b) he was not given a proper hearing to determine his competency to stand trial; (c) the government failed to sustain its burden of proving that he was sane at the time of the alleged offense; (d) he was not competent at the time of sentencing; and (e) his court-appointed counsel negligently and incompetently represented him.
An examination of the district…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Solesbee v. BalkcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- James P. Taylor v. United States of America, James Peter Taylor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Nobles v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- D. A. Simmons, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Houser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- George M. Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- James Lowell Rose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Wilfred Frank Peoples v. United States of America, Warden J. J. Norton and John O. Garaas, United States AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Stewart v. StephensDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.