Legal Opinion

State v. Leyba

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1979No. 4097PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Judge.

Defendants were indicted by the grand jury for shoplifting in violation of § 30-16-20, and for conspiracy, in violation of § 30-28-2, N.M.S.A.1978. The trial court dismissed the charge of conspiracy on the ground that § 30-16-20 C expressly prohibits charging a separate or additional offense if it arises out of the same transaction upon which the shoplifting charge is based. The State contends the trial court misconstrued § 30-16-20 C, because it logically refers to additional similar charges such as larceny, and that the second charge should be reinstated.

The parties to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ThoreenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. People v. EdwardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  5. State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States v. Algie KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  3. State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State v. GilbertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. State v. VillalobosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API