State v. Leyba
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALTERS, Judge.
Defendants were indicted by the grand jury for shoplifting in violation of § 30-16-20, and for conspiracy, in violation of § 30-28-2, N.M.S.A.1978. The trial court dismissed the charge of conspiracy on the ground that § 30-16-20 C expressly prohibits charging a separate or additional offense if it arises out of the same transaction upon which the shoplifting charge is based. The State contends the trial court misconstrued § 30-16-20 C, because it logically refers to additional similar charges such as larceny, and that the second charge should be reinstated.
The parties to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ThoreenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. DavisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
- State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. Algie KingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. GilbertNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. VillalobosNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.