Legal Opinion

Sewell v. Walkley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Elmore Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Whiteside. Bill by Earl B. Walkley and others against N. B. Sewell, for rescission and to redeem. Prom a decree overruling demurrers to the amended bill, respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SOMERVILLE, J.—(1) Disregarding-several unnecessary allegations, the amended bill of complaint shows that complainants executed a deed to respondent conveying certain land belonging to one of the complainants; that this deed, though absolute in form, was agreed and understood to be a mortgage for the security of $600 due from one of the complainants, and $1,000 to be presently loaned to the other complainant; that the $1,000 was never in fact advanced; and that .complainants aré entitled to redeem and have a reconveyance of the land. The bill, judged by its special prayer for relief, is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. KnightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Knutson v. BostrakWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Teague v. TeagueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Glenn v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Owen v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  4. Crew v. W. T. Smith Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Davis Bluff Land & Timber Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API