Legal Opinion

Cutler v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover damages for trespass by defendant on the land of the plaintiff, for timber cut and removed from said land and to vacate a deed dated 17 March, 1899, or to have it corrected.

It appeared on the trial and was admitted by all parties, that the plaintiff had conveyed all the timber on the land embraced in the deed of 17 March, 1899, to the defendant, by deed dated 28 February, 1887, of a size above 13 inches diameter at the stump; and that the time in which defendant was to cut and remove said timber had not expired by some months. The allegation of the plaintiff is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Medlin v. . BufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. McArthur v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  3. Saunders v. . HattermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841
  4. Lytle v. . BirdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1855
  5. Gant v. . HunsuckerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1851

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Mills v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Mosher v. Sawyer-Weber Tool Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API