Bowen v. Kizer
Supreme Court of the United States
1Per curiam
We granted the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ petition for certiorari, 479 U. S. 1083 (1987), in order to review the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Cir cuit that the Secretary unlawfully rejected a California Medicaid plan amendment because an internal agency manual stating approval of the type of provision in question was a binding regulation, and because acceptance of the amendment was required by § 2373(c) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369, 98 Stat. 1112, note following 42 U. S. C. § 1396a (1982 ed., Supp. III). Cubanski v. Heckler, 781 F. 2d…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Deakins v. MonaghanSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cubanski v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
3Cited by16 opinions
- American Library Association, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. William P. Barr, Attorney General of the United States, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Cooper Technologies Co. v. DudasCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. QuiggCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Lewis v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees Union, Local 25District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- California, Department of Health Services v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.