Legal Opinion

Associated Inv. Co. v. Cayias

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1919No. 3381PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from District Court, Third District, Salt Lake County; P. G. Evans, Judge. Action by the Associated Investment Company, a corporation, against William Cayias and another, a copartnership doing business as the Portóla Pool Hall. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCorfman, C. J.

Plaintiff, as a real estate and personal property broker, brought this action against the defendants in tjie district court of Salt Lake county to recover commissions alleged to have become due for services rendered under a contract for the sale or exchange of a certain pool hall owned by the defendants in Salt Lake City. The contract sued upon provides:

‘‘Please sell or trade for me the following described property at the price and terms below mentioned: Portóla Pool Hall, No. 2 West Second South street, consisting of eleven tables, one card room. Rent, $150.00. Business averages about thirty…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Northwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Zeidler v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Root v. ChildsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Hobart v. KehoeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Sullivan v. MillikenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commercial Union Associates v. ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API