Legal Opinion

Penrod v. Ohio Department of Administrative Services

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 2007No. 2005-2373 and 2005-2374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.

{¶ 1} In this appeal we consider whether the abolishment of a state employee’s position was accomplished consistent with the requirements of former R.C. 124.321(D). We hold that it was not, and, thus, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} In 2002, defendant-appellant, the Ohio Department of Administrative Services (“DAS”) decided to abolish the position of plaintiff-appellee, Joyce Penrod, who was a Facilities Planning Project Manager in the State Architect’s Office (“SAO”). In that exempt position, Penrod supervised four employees and *240assisted state…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ogan v. TeaterOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State ex rel. Bispeck v. Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Potten v. KuthOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Weston v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. McAlpin v. ShireyOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Civil Service Commission of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  2. Miller v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'NCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
  3. Yachanin v. Cleveland Civ. Serv. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Deem v. Fairview ParkOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. State ex rel. Ohio Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v. Warren (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API