Legal Opinion
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc. v. General Cinema Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1988No. Nos. 86-2553, 86-15046 and 87-1740PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOOCHEVER, Circuit Judge:
Harkins Amusement Enterprises, Inc., and Daniel E. Harkins (Harkins) appeal district court judgments in favor of numerous antitrust defendants. This case involves an alleged agreement between certain motion picture exhibitors in the Phoenix, Arizona area regarding film licensing. Seven distributors are accused of cooperating in this conspiracy, resulting in competitive injury to Harkins, an independent exhibitor.
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona denied Harkins’ request for a continuance of a partial summary judgment motion filed by the film…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Monsanto Co. v. Spray-Rite Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation. State of Arizona v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Continental Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Phillips Petroleum Co. Caribou Four Corners, Inc. And Powerine Oil Co., State of California v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Atlantic Richfield Co. Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Oregon, on Behalf of Itself, Its Residents and All Political Subdivisions Within the State Similarly Situated v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. And Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. Gulf Oil Corp. And Phillips Petroleum Co., State of Washington, on Behalf of Itself and Its Public Entities and Residents v. Standard Oil Co. Of California Texaco, Inc. Union Oil Co. Of California Atlantic Richfield Co. Exxon Corp. Gulf Oil Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Shell Oil Co., and Getty Oil Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jtc Petroleum Company v. Piasa Motor Fuels, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Arista Records LLC v. Lime Group LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. City of SewardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. James P. HeffernanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.