Legal Opinion

Andres Damian v. American National Property and Casualty Company

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 21, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00964Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 Andres Damian, Case No. 2:25-cv-00964-NJK 6 Plaintiff(s), Order 7 v. [Docket No. 45] 8 American National Property and Casualty 9 Company, 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is Defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment.1 Docket 12 No. 45. Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 46. Defendant filed a reply. Docket 13 No. 49. The motion is properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons 14 discussed below, the motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 This…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. William Earl Warren III v. City of Carlsbad Brian Watson James Thompson Frank Mannen Raymond Patchett Stewart Gary Ann JansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Kaiser Cement Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Fischbach and Moore, Inc., the Howard P. Foley Co., a District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API