Legal Opinion

Sexton v. Xerox Corporation

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided September 16, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00188Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I GLENN SEXTON, Civil No. 24-00188 MWJS-RT Plaintiff, ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL vs. ARBITRATION IN ABEYANCE XEROX CORPORATION, Defendant. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Glenn Sexton brought this suit against his former employer, Defendant Xerox Corporation, seeking to recover unpaid compensation. Xerox now moves to compel arbitration. No party disputes that if a binding arbitration agreement exists, the Court must enforce it. But the parties disagree as to whether one exists, and each insists that their view should prevail…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Nicosia v. Amazon.com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Company, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API