Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1905No. 4653PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the County Court of the City and County of Denver: Eon. Ben B. Lindsey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

Action by defendant in error, as plaintiff in the court below, against plaintiff in error, as defendant, for a divorce and alimony.

*299A common-law marriage, adultery and extreme cruelty were alleged; a divorce, suit money, temporary and permanent alimony were prayed.

The answer was a general denial and an affirmative defense that at the date of the. alleged common-law marriage the defendant had a wife living, which fact plaintiff well knew. There was no reply.

Upon trial to a jury, a verdict was returned to the effect that there was a common-law marriage and that both parties had been guilty of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daum v. ConleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  2. Redington v. RedingtonColorado Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Burton v. SnyderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Hume v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Cupples v. CupplesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fitzsimmons v. Olinger Mortuary Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  2. Fitzsimmons v. Olinger Mortuary Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API