(PC)Witkin v. Snelling
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MICHAEL AARON WITKIN, No. 2:21-cv-02181 DAD AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 C. SNELLING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint is before the 19 court for screening. ECF No. 19. 20 I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 21 As plaintiff was previously advised, the court is required to screen complaints brought by 22 prisoners…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.