Legal Opinion

Vernon v. Acton

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 2000No. 49S02-9809-CV-488PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDickson, Justice

The plaintiff-appellants, Kirk and Martha Vernon, are appealing from a judg ment granting motions to enforce an oral pre-trial mediation settlement agreement and to impose attorney fees filed by the defendant-appellee, Adam Acton. Denying the existence of any agreement, the plaintiffs raised multiple issues on appeal. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Vernon v. Acton, 693 N.E.2d 1345 (Ind.Ct.App.1998). We granted transfer and requested additional briefing regarding issues related to the Indiana Rules for Alternative Dispute Resolution (A.D.R.Rules). We now reverse the trial court, concluding…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klebes v. Forest Lake Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hudson v. HudsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance v. WaltersIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Silkey v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Anderson v. Yorktown Classroom Teachers Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Zimmerman v. McColleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Reese v. Tingey ConstructionUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Estate of Skalka v. SkalkaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Reno v. HalerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API