Legal Opinion

In re Woodbury

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 13, 1916PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the Home Rule Tax Association of the State of New York, Unincorporated, and by Charles S. Mereness, individually and as president of said association, and Francis A. Willard, individually and as secretary of said association, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 13th day of April, 1916, denying a motion made by the appellants to dismiss this proceeding because of…

Read the full summary

Appeal by the Home Rule Tax Association of the State of New York, Unincorporated, and by Charles S. Mereness, individually and as president of said association, and Francis A. Willard, individually and as secretary of said association, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Albany on the 13th day of April, 1916, denying a motion made by the appellants to dismiss this proceeding because of the insufficiency of the moving papers to confer jurisdiction.

1Opinion of the Court

Kellogg, P. J. :

Section 540 of the Election Law has defined the words “ political committee ” and has left nothing for inference as to their meaning. The expression is not limited to political committees as such. If we read the definition there given into section 546 of the Election Law, it is plain that where three or more persons co-operate to bring about the election or defeat of a candidate or a proposition at an election, and make any expe nd itures of money in so doing, they must make a report of their receipts and disbursements. The only exception to the rule is that it shall not apply…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. New York Civil Liberties Union, Inc. v. AcitoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  3. Labelle v. Hennepin County Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. In re the Application for an Order Requiring the Anti-Saloon LeagueNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Baxter v. FarkasNew York Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API