Legal Opinion

Modern Woodmen of America v. Stone

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 16, 1919No. 10,051Published

From Davies Circuit Court; William E. Gardiner, Special Judge. Action-by Martba A. Stone against the Modern Woodmen of America. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBatman, J.

— -This is a second appeal in this cause. On the trial subsequent to the decision on the former appeal, the pleadings theretofore filed remained unchanged, but appellant filed two additional paragraphs of answer, numbered 5 and 6. Appellee filed *602a reply to these paragraphs in general denial, and also filed a second paragraph of reply addressed to the first, second, fifth and sixth paragraphs of answer. The issues on the original trial are sufficiently shown in the opinion of the court on the former appeal, and no good purpose would be served by restating them here. Modern Woodmen, etc. v.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Supreme Council v. CurdIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Simplex Railway Appliance Co. v. Western Rawhide & Belting Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. SenourIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Waters v. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Curtis v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API