Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rosario

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1993No. 12 E.D. Appeal Docket 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MONTEMURO, Justice.

On March 31, 1989, appellant Aida Rosario was found guilty of possession and possession with intent to deliver cocaine. The charges stemmed from drug sales made out of appellant’s residence during her absence by a man who has never been charged, or indeed completely identified, in connection with this case. The sentence imposed, eleven and one half to twenty-three months house arrest, with a subsequent three year term of probation, was appealed by the Commonwealth, and the Superior Court reused, concluding that the leniency of the sentence was an abuse of the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolzerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. RitcheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. PalmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. ParrishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. CartretteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Commonwealth v. RiggSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Com. v. Genther, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API