Legal Opinion
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Ahmed
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 7, 2004No. A04-310Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUDSON, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s decision (1) quashing an arbitrator’s order concerning appellant’s attendance at a future independent medical examination; and (2) dismissing appellant’s Minnesota no-fault claim for unreimbursed medical expenses. Because we conclude that the arbitrator’s order did not constitute an “award” subject to vacation by the district court under Minn.Stat. § 572.19, subd. 1(3) (2002), the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider the matter and we vacate the judgment accordingly.
FACTS
Appellant Naima M. Ahmed was injured in an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill Harbert Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Island Creek Coal Sales Company v. City of Gainesville, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Olson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Hoit v. Berger-Crittenden Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Aaron v. Illinois Farmers Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999