Legal Opinion

Boise Cascade Corp. v. Wheeler

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 10, 1976No. 75 Civ. 6072-LFMPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MacMAHON, District Judge.

Defendants E. Todd Wheeler and The Perkins & Will Partnership (hereinafter referred to collectively as “Perkins & Will” or “Architect”) move, pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 19, Fed.R.Civ.P., to dismiss the amended complaint for plaintiff’s failure to join an indispensable party plaintiff whose joinder would destroy diversity jurisdiction in this case.

Plaintiff Boise Cascade Corporation (“Boise”) is a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in Idaho. Perkins & Will is a partnership of architects, none of whose members are citizens of Delaware or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Brock v. . PoorNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Harry Lewis v. Robert S. Odell, and Howard Butcher IIICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  4. Jerome J. Berger v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  5. People v. . American Bell Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Edward C. Carey, and New England Petroleum Corporation v. National Oil Corporation and Libyan Arab RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  2. Eisenberg v. Feiner (In Re Ahead by a Length, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Schattner v. Girard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. Airvator, Inc. v. Turtle Mountain Manufacturing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. 24/7 Records, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API