Legal Opinion

Caudle v. Patridge

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 27, 1990No. 89-161PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Michael Carmen Caudle appeals from summary judgments in favor of defendants Bill Patridge, d/b/a Off-Road Birmingham, and Eastwood Ford, Inc., in his products liability suit against them.1 At issue is a "conversion kit" sold by Patridge, which was used to convert a 1973 Ford Courier truck from two-wheel drive to four-wheel drive; the truck was later traded and Eastwood Ford subsequently sold the truck as modified. Caudle was severely injured when the truck flipped over while he was a passenger in it.

Michael McCullars initially purchased the truck in 1982 and spoke with Patridge, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc. v. Haven Hills Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Beloit Corp. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. CONSOL. PIPE & SUPPLY v. Stockham Valves & FittingsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Wakeland v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1998
  3. Chase v. Kawasaki Motors Corp., USADistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2001
  4. Campbell v. Robert Bosch Power Tool Corp.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
  5. Dillard v. Pittway Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API