Nunneley v. Edgar Hotel
California Supreme Court
1DissentTraynor, J.
I dissent.
I agree that the trial court’s instructions concerning negligence per se were erroneous. I do not agree, however, that the error was not prejudicial.
If there are two independent grounds upon which a verdict may have been based, erroneous instructions as to one ground will not justify reversal if it clearly appears that the verdict was based upon the other ground. (Oettinger v. Stewart, 24 Cal.2d 133, 140 [148 P.2d 19, 156 A.L.B. 1221].) Thus, there need be no reversal if such other ground is established as a matter of law (Clement v. State Reclamation Board, 35 Cal.2d 628, 643 [220…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Edwards v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Huebotter v. FollettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.