Legal Opinion

Hill Hardman Oldfield, L.L.C. v. Gilbert

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 2010No. 25122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dickinson, Presiding Judge.

INTRODUCTION

{¶ 1} Attorney Edward Gilbert represented James Hall in a racial-discrimination case, a black-mold case, and a dog-bite case. When Hall fell behind in some of his payments for costs in the racial-discrimination case, he, allegedly, told Gilbert that he would pay him from his award in the black-mold case. Hall later fired Gilbert in the black-mold case and hired John Hill, who negotiated a settlement of the case. When Gilbert claimed an interest in Hall’s settlement award, Hill interpleaded part of the award in the common pleas court. Gilbert filed a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beer v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Cohen v. GoldbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  3. West Broad Chiropractic v. American Family InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Gibbons v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Petty v. Kroger Food & PharmacyOhio Court of Appeals · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L. L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L.L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  3. Lopez v. ThomasOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Kisling, Nestico & Redick, L. L.C. v. Progressive Max Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API