Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of De Martino

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 24, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The hearing directed by the former opinion of the court in this proceeding (Matter of De Martino, 142 Misc. 431, 436), for the purpose of determining the relative dependency of the various members of decedent's family, has now been had, and from the evidence adduced it becomes the duty of the court to allocate to those demonstrating dependency their several portions of the fund available herein.

Extended discussion of the controlling principles applicable is unnecessary as they have been reviewed at length in Matter of Uravic (142 Misc. 775), decided herewith.

The pertinent evidence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of UravicNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  2. In re the Estate of De MartinoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re AcquafreddaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re the Estate of TrofemukNew York Surrogate's Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API