Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of De Martino
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided January 13, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The question involved in this case, while by no means one of first impression, is historically interesting by reason of the fact that in its determination, the Court of Appeals of this *432State unanimously reached one conclusion ( Uravic v. Jarka Co., 252 N. Y. 530), while the United States Supreme Court, with equal unanimity, attained a diametrically opposed result (282 U. S. 234). (See, also, Matter of Taylor, 204 N. Y. 135; revd., Taylor v. Taylor, 232 U. S. 263.)
This decedent was a stevedore. On August 14, 1931, he was employed by the Bay Ridge Operating Co., Inc., a domestic…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. WulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Cunard Steamship Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In re the Accounting of KaiserNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re the Estate of UravicNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
- In re the Estate of RademakerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of KleinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of AronowitzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.