Legal Opinion
Locke v. Cowan
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1917No. Civ. Nos. 2136, 2137PublishedCited by 1 opinion
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court,
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
These two actions were instituted in the superior court of the county of Sonoma by the plaintiff against the defendants for the foreclosure of certain assessment liens, arising out of street work performed in the city of Santa Rosa, pursuant to proceedings instituted by the city council under the provisions of the city charter.
The plaintiff secured a judgment in each case, decreeing the foreclosure of the respective liens, from which the defendants have appealed in each case, and both cases are here upon a single record.
The demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint was properly overruled.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Himmelman v. DanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Blochman v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Woollacott v. MeekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Court of Appeal · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of South San Francisco v. Santa Clara Valley Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923