Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Robinson

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 20, 1994No. 92-1705 (PJM)PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MESSITTE, District Judge.

I

Plaintiff Edward F. Dyer has brought a defamation/invasion of privacy suit against Defendant David V. Robinson, basing this Court’s jurisdiction on the parties’ allegedly diverse citizenship. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Plaintiff, a citizen of Maryland, contends that Defendant is a citizen of North Carolina.

Defendant answers that he is in fact domiciled in, hence a “citizen” of Maryland, citing this State as his “domicile of origin” and the fact that he owns and pays taxes on certain real estate in Howard County. He has thus filed a motion to dismiss the case on the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Gilbert v. DavidSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sautter v. Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
  2. Gambelli v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
  3. Cressler v. NeuenschwanderDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. Ward v. WalkerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2010
  5. UDX, LLC v. HeavnerDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API