Legal Opinion
Rothfuss v. Bakers Mut. Insurance Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 17, 1969PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
107 N.J. Super. 189 (1969)
257 A.2d 733
CHARLES ROTHFUSS AND JUANITA ROTHFUSS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BAKERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK, A CORPORATION AUTHORIZED TO DO BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 15, 1969.
Decided October 17, 1969.
Before Judges SULLIVAN, CARTON and HALPERN.
Mr. John D'Amico, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Drazin, Warshaw, Auerbach and Rudnick, attorneys).
Mr. Isidor Kalisch argued the cause for respondent (Mr. George H. McElroy, attorney).
HALPERN, J.A.D.
The narrow…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fabricius v. Montgomery Elevator CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
- Smith v. American Employers' InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1960
- Bryan v. JeffersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Mager v. United Hospitals of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Sturgiss v. CorbinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Basil v. WolfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Delamotte v. Unitcast Division of Midland Ross Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Newby v. GerryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Van Biene v. ERA Helicopters, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.