Roy McAmis Disposal Service, Inc. v. Hiwassee Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SANDERS, Judge.
The Defendants have appealed form a chancery decree enjoining them from vio*227lating the non-competitive provision of a contract.
In January, 1976, the Plaintiff-Appellee, Roy McAmis Disposal Service, Inc., and the Defendant-Appellant, Hiwassee Systems, Inc., were both engaged in the solid waste disposal business in Bradley County and adjoining counties. They both serviced household and commercial accounts, making a monthly charge to their customers for their service. The Defendant serviced primarily household accounts but had a limited number of commercial accounts. The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- American Lead Pencil Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
- Cummins v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Forest Inc. of Knoxville v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
- Seeley v. Pilot Fire & Casualty CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
- Boyd v. Peoples Protective Life Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ClementsTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Berkeley Park Homeowners Association, Inc. v. John TaborCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
- Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Union Pacific CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Union Pacific CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
- Johnson v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.