Legal Opinion

Roy McAmis Disposal Service, Inc. v. Hiwassee Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided August 2, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SANDERS, Judge.

The Defendants have appealed form a chancery decree enjoining them from vio*227lating the non-competitive provision of a contract.

In January, 1976, the Plaintiff-Appellee, Roy McAmis Disposal Service, Inc., and the Defendant-Appellant, Hiwassee Systems, Inc., were both engaged in the solid waste disposal business in Bradley County and adjoining counties. They both serviced household and commercial accounts, making a monthly charge to their customers for their service. The Defendant serviced primarily household accounts but had a limited number of commercial accounts. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Lead Pencil Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis RailwayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Cummins v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Forest Inc. of Knoxville v. Guaranty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  4. Seeley v. Pilot Fire & Casualty CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Boyd v. Peoples Protective Life Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ClementsTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Berkeley Park Homeowners Association, Inc. v. John TaborCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2010
  3. Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Union Pacific CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  4. Clean Harbors, Inc. v. Union Pacific CorporationSuperior Court of Delaware · 2017
  5. Johnson v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API