Legal Opinion

Woolfolk v. Jones

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided August 6, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Joseph W. Woolfolk against John T. Jones. On petition by defendant and others for decree against complainant and the surety on his injunction bond. The defendant John T. Jones instituted in the law and equity court of the city of Richmond, against the complainant Joseph W. Woolfolk, two actions at law, one to recover $10,000, and the other $25,000, which suits were by appropriate proceedings removed into this court.

Read the full summary

In Equity. Suit by Joseph W. Woolfolk against John T. Jones. On petition by defendant and others for decree against complainant and the surety on his injunction bond. The defendant John T. Jones instituted in the law and equity court of the city of Richmond, against the complainant Joseph W. Woolfolk, two actions at law, one to recover $10,000, and the other $25,000, which suits were by appropriate proceedings removed into this court. Before trial, the complainant Woolfolk filed his bill in this cause, seeking to enjoin the prosecution of the two suits at law on the ground, among others, that…

1Opinion of the Court

WADDIRL,, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Three questions are presented for the consideration of the court: First, what is the true meaning of the bond in question, and the liability of the surety thereunder to the defendant, Jones; second, whether the petitioners Miller and Brown are entitled to recover thereunder the amount of the costs, respectively, allowed in their favor, and set up by them in their petition; and, third, whether any recovery under the circumstances could properly be had upon the bond. These will be disposed of in the order named.

[1] 1. The defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Meyers v. BlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Bein v. HeathSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  4. Hutchins v. MunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Erickson v. ElderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Motors Service, Inc. v. Tropic-Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Carr v. Citizens Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API