Conant v. Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi, L.L.P.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.
Appellants Roger Conant and Senator Thomas Neuville appeal the summary judgment dismissing their action against Robins, Kaplan, Miller Ciresi, L.L.P., in its capacity as special attorney for the State of Minnesota, challenging the law firm’s direct receipt of costs and attorney fees from the settling defendants. Appellants contend that the law firm was required to deposit these funds into the state treasury, and that the law firm could receive payment for its services only through a legislative appropriation. Appellants assert they have standing to raise these…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Coleman v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Philip Morris Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Uselman v. UselmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. Philip Morris, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Pickering v. Langston Law Firm, P.A.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2012
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- SER Discover Financial Services, Inc. v. Hon. David W. Nibert and SER Glaxosmithkline, LLC v. Hon. James H. Young, Jr.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Rukavina v. PawlentyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.