Legal Opinion

F. H. Vahlsing, Ing., Texas v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 26, 1966No. 22488_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The United States brought this action against F. H. Vahlsing, Inc. to remedy the defendant’s violation of the Agricultural Adjustment Act, 7 U.S.C. §§ 601-624, and Federal Marketing Order No. 970, 7 C.F.R. Part 970. According to the complaint, the only violation was Vahlsing’s failure to pay certain assessments due under the order. The district court entered a default judgment against Vahlsing, ordering it to pay certain back assessments and enjoining the company from “handling carrots in violation of the terms and provisions of said Act and Order 970, as it is now in effect and as it may…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Russell C. House Transfer & Storage Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Nasif v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Dairy of Evansville, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. American Dairy of Evansville, Inc. v. Robert Bergland, Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API