Legal Opinion
Department 56, Inc. v. Bloom
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 2001PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Frank V. Ponterio, J.
The decision/order on this motion is as follows: Plaintiff, Department 56, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, brings this action for goods sold and delivered. Defendant, Steve Bloom, moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the goods were sold to a New Jersey corporation, EPS Collectors Emporium, Inc. (hereinafter EPS), of which he was president, and plaintiff has no meritorious cause of action against him individually.
*902The essential facts are not in dispute. Over a period from July 1996 to February 1997 plaintiff sold certain…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brandes Meat Corp. v. CromerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Quaid v. RatkowskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Hyland Meat Co. v. TsagarakisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- J. M. Lynne Co. v. GeraghtySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Poritzky v. WachtelNew York Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pannell v. ShannonKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Daniels v. Elks Club of Hartford and the Human Rights CommissionSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
- First Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. N.A. Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Nigro v. DwyerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Olympus America, Inc. v. 5th Avenue Photo Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.