Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Daniel K. Mayers v. Peter S. Ridley

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 30, 1972No. 71-1418Published

1Concurrence

WILKEY, Circuit Judge, with whom Circuit Judges McGOWAN and LEV-ENTHAL

concur.

Judge Wright’s opinion is infused throughout with broad constitutional discussions and assumptions, with which not all members of the majority are in complete accord. Therefore, it seems desirable to set forth separately the more limited rationale on which several members of the court do in fact agree.

The doctrine of judicial restraint, that cautions a court to avoid decision of constitutional questions when not necessary for disposition of a controversy, applies also, we think, to serious reliance on an application…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Barrows v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Katzenbach v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Daniel v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API