Kline v. Spahr
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Jennings Circuit Court. .
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, C. J.
Suit by the endorsee of the payee, against the maker, of a promissory note.
The complaint averred the endorsement, hut did not set out a copy of it. This was unnecessary. Treadway v. Cobb, 18 Ind. 36. The note was payable at a hank in this State. On the trial, the note was admitted in evidence, hut was objected to on account of an alleged variance. We have carefully compared the copy in the complaint with the note given in evidence. There is no variance between them. There seems to he two copies of notes in the bill of exceptions. The true note was recognized on the trial by the parties as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Steinmetz v. WingateIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Treadway v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fordyce v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Gipe v. CumminsIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Kennard v. HarveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Jester v. GustinIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Short v. KernsIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.