Legal Opinion

Crow v. Giebelhaus

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1992No. S-89-1324PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

Perry Crow commenced a negligence action against Ralph L. Giebelhaus and Donna R. Giebelhaus concerning Crow’s bodily injuries. Giebelhauses jointly demurred and claimed that Crow’s petition did not allege sufficient facts to state a cause of action. See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-806(6) (Reissue 1989) (insufficient factual allegations for a cause of action). The district court for Lancaster County sustained the Giebelhaus demurrer, failed to allow Crow an opportunity to amend his petition, and dismissed the action.

A court’s dismissal of an action after a demurrer has been sustained to a petition…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Security Investment Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Danner v. WaltersNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Newman Grove Creamery Co. v. DeaverNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Cagle, Inc. v. SammonsNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Balfany v. BalfanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cobb v. Sure Crop Chemical Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  2. First Nat. Bank of Omaha v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Wichman v. NaylorNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API