Ansley v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partHutcheson, Circuit Judge
I concur in the conclusion of the majority that the record contains ample evidence to support the judgment as to the Ansleys; I dissent from the conclusion that it does as to Bernice Miller Lewis. The offense of which she was convicted was conspiracy to commit and not the commission of a substantive offense. There was proof connecting her with one of the overt acts, the sale by Lewis to the informer. Agreement, however, is the gist of the offense of conspiracy. Overt acts are no part of the offense, and the only effect of their requirement is to afford “a locus pcenitentias, so that before…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. MantonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- United States v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Dawson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Trust Co. v. SedgwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Potter v. Florida Motor Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.